Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the challenges of citizenship issues in preparing Indonesia's golden generation in 2045. This research is content analysis research with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation and tracing documents and archives. The results show great challenges of Indonesian as a state in terms of maintaining the foundational philosophical theory of Pancasila. This determines the importance of a study of civic education as the spearhead in preparing the generation that will inherit the nation and state of Indonesia. In 2045, Indonesia expects to have a golden generation. This of course requires Indonesian as a state to prepare its human resources, namely the younger generation, to face this momentum well. The golden generation of Indonesia is expected to be a generation that is tough, thinks forward, and always upholds the values of Pancasila. The golden generation of Indonesia in 2045 is the hope for the future of the nation. Civics as a subject in school has a paramount role in preparing Indonesia’s golden generation in 2045. Civics must be able to solve challenges such as intolerance, the ideology of other nations, and globalization. The prospect of civic education is being promoted as a panacea for solving problems that exist in Indonesia as a nation.

Keywords

golden generation, civic education generasi emas pendidikan kewarganegaraan golden golden generation civic education

Article Details

References

  1. Abi, A. R. (2017). Paradigma membangun generasi emas indonesia tahun 2045. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2).
  2. Brata D.N.P., Mahatmaharti A.K., Istianingrum Rika., Hasanudin Cahyo., H. S. (2020). Developing Pancasila And Civic Education (PPKN) Based On Local Wisdom. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 768–773.
  3. Cresweel, john w. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset. International Journal of Physiology.
  4. Darmaningtyas. (2015). Pendidikan yang Memiskinkan (Instrans P).
  5. De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2016). Why choose open government? Motivations for the adoption of open government policies in four European countries. Policy & Internet, 8(3), 225–247.
  6. Denhardt, J.V., and Denhardt, R. (2015). The new public sevice revisted. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24757439
  7. Fadilah, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Penguatan Ideologi Pancasila dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Journal of Digital Education, Communication, and Arts, 2(2), 66–78.
  8. Fauzi, A. (2017). Agama, Pancasila dan konflik Sosial di Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 4(2), Lentera Huk. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/eJLH/article/view/5295.Doi:https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v4i2.5295
  9. Gredinant, D. (2017). Apllication Of State Defense Education In Colleges. Prodi Strategi Pertahanan Darat, 3(1), 1–17.
  10. Huda, M. C. (2018). Meneguhkan Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Bernegara:Implementasi Nilai Nilai Keseimbangan dalam Upaya Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia. Resolusi Jurnal Sosial Politik, 1(1), 2018. https://doi.org/https://ojs.unisiq.ac.id/index.php/resolusi/issue/view/11
  11. Ihsan. (2017). Kecenderungan global dalam proses pembelajaran pendidikan Pancasila dan kewarganegaraan di sekolah. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2).
  12. Kaelan. (2018). Negara Kebangsaan Pancasila (Kultur, Historis, Filosofis, Yuridis, dan Aktualisasinya).
  13. Karsadi, D. (2017). Menciptakan Generasi yang Berwawasan Global Berkarakter Lokal Melalui Harmonisasi Nilai Kosmopolitan dan Nasionalisme dalam Pembelajaran PKn. Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(2).
  14. Kemendikbud. (2017). Peta Jalan Generasi Emas Indonesia 2045. In Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidian dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://paska.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/170822-V.2-Generasi-Emas-2045-.pdf
  15. Purnomo. A.S., Widayat.W., P. W. . (2021). Pancasila’s Perspective on Dichotomous View between Inspection and Public Service in Immigration Border Control. International Journal of Religious and Cultural Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.34199/ijracs.2021.09.06
  16. Rukiyati. (2017). Pendidikan moral di sekolah. Humanika, XVII(1).
  17. Samsuri. (2013). paradigma pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam kurikulum 2013.
  18. T.E, P., & R., S. H. R. H. M. dan M. (2016). Puspawarna Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. Kementerian Ristekdikti RI.
  19. Yuningsih, Y. (2019). Pendidikan Kecakapan Abad Ke-21 Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045. Jurnal Pedagogik Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 135–152.