THE GRAND DESIGN OF GOLDEN GENERATION 2045: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS OF CIVICS SUBJECT MATTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24832/jpkp.v14i2.532Keywords:
golden, golden generation, civic educationAbstract
This study aims to analyze the challenges of citizenship issues in preparing Indonesia's golden generation in 2045. This research is content analysis research with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through observation and tracing documents and archives. The results show great challenges of Indonesian as a state in terms of maintaining the foundational philosophical theory of Pancasila. This determines the importance of a study of civic education as the spearhead in preparing the generation that will inherit the nation and state of Indonesia. In 2045, Indonesia expects to have a golden generation. This of course requires Indonesian as a state to prepare its human resources, namely the younger generation, to face this momentum well. The golden generation of Indonesia is expected to be a generation that is tough, thinks forward, and always upholds the values of Pancasila. The golden generation of Indonesia in 2045 is the hope for the future of the nation. Civics as a subject in school has a paramount role in preparing Indonesia’s golden generation in 2045. Civics must be able to solve challenges such as intolerance, the ideology of other nations, and globalization. The prospect of civic education is being promoted as a panacea for solving problems that exist in Indonesia as a nation.
References
Abi, A. R. (2017). Paradigma membangun generasi emas indonesia tahun 2045. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2).
Brata D.N.P., Mahatmaharti A.K., Istianingrum Rika., Hasanudin Cahyo., H. S. (2020). Developing Pancasila And Civic Education (PPKN) Based On Local Wisdom. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 8(1), 768–773.
Cresweel, john w. (2015). Penelitian Kualitatif Dan Desain Riset. International Journal of Physiology.
Darmaningtyas. (2015). Pendidikan yang Memiskinkan (Instrans P).
De Blasio, E., & Selva, D. (2016). Why choose open government? Motivations for the adoption of open government policies in four European countries. Policy & Internet, 8(3), 225–247.
Denhardt, J.V., and Denhardt, R. (2015). The new public sevice revisted. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 664–672. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24757439
Fadilah, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Penguatan Ideologi Pancasila dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Journal of Digital Education, Communication, and Arts, 2(2), 66–78.
Fauzi, A. (2017). Agama, Pancasila dan konflik Sosial di Indonesia. Lentera Hukum, 4(2), Lentera Huk. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/eJLH/article/view/5295.Doi:https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v4i2.5295
Gredinant, D. (2017). Apllication Of State Defense Education In Colleges. Prodi Strategi Pertahanan Darat, 3(1), 1–17.
Huda, M. C. (2018). Meneguhkan Pancasila Sebagai Ideologi Bernegara:Implementasi Nilai Nilai Keseimbangan dalam Upaya Pembangunan Hukum di Indonesia. Resolusi Jurnal Sosial Politik, 1(1), 2018. https://doi.org/https://ojs.unisiq.ac.id/index.php/resolusi/issue/view/11
Ihsan. (2017). Kecenderungan global dalam proses pembelajaran pendidikan Pancasila dan kewarganegaraan di sekolah. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 2(2).
Kaelan. (2018). Negara Kebangsaan Pancasila (Kultur, Historis, Filosofis, Yuridis, dan Aktualisasinya).
Karsadi, D. (2017). Menciptakan Generasi yang Berwawasan Global Berkarakter Lokal Melalui Harmonisasi Nilai Kosmopolitan dan Nasionalisme dalam Pembelajaran PKn. Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(2).
Kemendikbud. (2017). Peta Jalan Generasi Emas Indonesia 2045. In Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Kementerian Pendidian dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://paska.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/170822-V.2-Generasi-Emas-2045-.pdf
Purnomo. A.S., Widayat.W., P. W. . (2021). Pancasila’s Perspective on Dichotomous View between Inspection and Public Service in Immigration Border Control. International Journal of Religious and Cultural Studies, 3(2). https://doi.org/doi.org/10.34199/ijracs.2021.09.06
Rukiyati. (2017). Pendidikan moral di sekolah. Humanika, XVII(1).
Samsuri. (2013). paradigma pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam kurikulum 2013.
T.E, P., & R., S. H. R. H. M. dan M. (2016). Puspawarna Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. Kementerian Ristekdikti RI.
Yuningsih, Y. (2019). Pendidikan Kecakapan Abad Ke-21 Untuk Mewujudkan Indonesia Emas Tahun 2045. Jurnal Pedagogik Pendidikan Dasar, 9(1), 135–152.
Published
Issue
Section
Dimensions
Altmetrics
Statistics
Read Counter : 4226
Download : 5924
Crossmark/ Data Version
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
All articles submitted by the author and published in the Jurnal Penelitaian Kebijakan Pendidikan are fully copyrighted by the publication of Jurnal Penelitaian Kebijakan Pendidikan under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) by technically filling out the copyright transfer agreement and sending it to the publisher
Note :
The author can include in separate contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of rich versions of journal publications (for example: posting them to an institutional repository or publishing them in a book), with the acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (for example: in an institutional repository or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more powerful citations of published works. (See Open Access Effects).
